Gardner et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
Bret Gardner and Lynne Gardner |
Wells Fargo Bank NA |
2:2019cv00207 |
June 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Thomas O Rice |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Lynne Gardner, Bret Gardner re Wells Fargo Bank NA. (Kuznetz, Lawrence) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Ann Burnham on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank NA (Attorney Margaret Ann Burnham added to party Wells Fargo Bank NA(pty:dft))(Burnham, Margaret) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Catharine M Morisset on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank NA (Attorney Catharine M Morisset added to party Wells Fargo Bank NA(pty:dft))(Morisset, Catharine) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Wells Fargo Bank NA. (VR, Courtroom Deputy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DISCRIMINATORY EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES AND JURY DEMAND against Wells Fargo Bank NA ( Filing fee $ 400; Receipt # 0980-3189692) Jury Demand. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Kuznetz, Lawrence) (Attachment 1 replaced on 6/12/2019) Modified to replace with signed corrected civil cover sheet(VR, Courtroom Deputy). |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice assigned to case. (VR, Courtroom Deputy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.