Belew-Nyquist v. Quincy School District No 144
Deborah Belew-Nyquist |
- Quincy School District No 144-101 and Quincy School District No 144 |
2:2019cv00215 |
June 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Thomas O Rice |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Association of Counsel by Michael Bradley Love on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attorney Michael Bradley Love added to party Deborah Belew-Nyquist(pty:pla))(Love, Michael) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Deborah Belew-Nyquist re Quincy School District No 144. (Crotty, Matthew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E McFarland, Jr on behalf of Quincy School District No 144 (Attorney Michael E McFarland, Jr added to party Quincy School District No 144(pty:dft))(McFarland, Michael) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Quincy School District No 144. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice assigned to case. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against - Quincy School District No 144( Filing fee $ 400; Receipt # 0980-3196123) Jury Demand. Filed by Deborah Belew-Nyquist. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Crotty, Matthew) (Main Document replaced on 6/24/2019 and docket text correct to indicate correct spelling of defendant's name (CLP, Case Administrator). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.