Bartlett v. Saul
Plaintiff: William Richard Bartlett
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M Saul
Case Number: 2:2019cv00261
Filed: July 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Presiding Judge: John T Rodgers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob Peter Phillips on behalf of Andrew M Saul (Attorney Jacob Peter Phillips added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(Phillips, Jacob)
August 10, 2019 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by William Richard Bartlett. (Schurman, Rosemary)
August 6, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Michael Durkin on behalf of Andrew M Saul (Attorney Timothy Michael Durkin added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(Durkin, Timothy)
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT BY ALL PARTIES TO TRIAL AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LR, Case Administrator)
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status. IT IS SO ORDERED. TEXT ONLY entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order or notice on the matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (EW, Law Clerk)
July 29, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued to Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Summons US Attorney, #2 Summons US Attorney General) as to Andrew M Saul.(AY, Case Administrator)
July 26, 2019 Filing 3 Notice of Initial Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge and Consent or Non-Consent Form. Please Note: Consent Forms are not to be electronically filed with the Court. Return of Consent or Non-Consent is due by 08/05/2019. Case Management Deadline set for 8/5/2019. (AY, Case Administrator)
July 26, 2019 Notice of Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers assigned to case. (AY, Case Administrator)
July 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security IFP Pending Filed by William Richard Bartlett. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons #1 of 3, #4 Summons #2 of 3, #5 Summons #3 of 3)(Schurman, Rosemary) Modified on 7/29/2019 to restrict IFP Application (AY, Case Administrator).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bartlett v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Represented By: Jacob Peter Phillips
Represented By: Timothy Michael Durkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Richard Bartlett
Represented By: Rosemary B Schurman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?