English v. Saul
| Janice English |
| Andrew M Saul |
| 2:2019cv00414 |
| December 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Fred Van Sickle |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status. IT IS SO ORDERED. TEXT ONLY entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order or notice on the matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (EW, Law Clerk)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH LEAVE TO RENEW. Before the Court is Plaintiff's renewed request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals that the renewed Application is not signed by plaintiff. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Case Management Deadline set for 1/6/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (PL, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH LEAVE TO RENEW. Before the Court is Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals Plaintiff provided a monthly amount owed for rent and utilities, but failed to state how she is covering these expenses. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Case Management Deadline set for 1/3/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (TR, Case Administrator)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Andrew M Saul. (Attachments: #1 Summons U.S. Attorney General, #2 Summons U.S. Attorney's Office)(PL, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 2 Ex Parte Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Janice English. (Dellert, Christopher). Modified on 12/3/2019 to terminate motion and correct title of document (PL, Case Administrator). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M Saul IFP Pending Filed by Janice English. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons SSA, Office of the General Counsel, #3 Summons U.S. Attorney General, #4 Summons Spokane U.S. Attorney's Office)(Dellert, Christopher) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Senior Judge Fred Van Sickle assigned to case. (PL, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: English v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Janice English | |
| Represented By: | Christopher H Dellert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
