McDonald v. State of Washington et al
Petitioner: Robert James McDonald
Respondent: County of Chelan and State of Washington
Case Number: 2:2020cv00068
Filed: February 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Rosanna Malouf Peterson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2020 Filing 8 Motion for Reconsideration #6 Under a Writ of Coram Nobis and Vobis under Title 28 1651 and Rule Nisi of the All Writs Act by Robert James McDonald. Motion Hearing set for 4/13/2020 Without Oral Argument before Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(SG, Case Administrator)
February 26, 2020 Filing 7 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION. (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) (SG, Case Administrator)
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND DENYING #4 MOTION TO EXPEDITE - The court further certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c);Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (SG, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
February 24, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Defendant Chelan County by Douglas J Shae on behalf of County of Chelan (Attorney Douglas J Shae added to party County of Chelan(pty:res))(Shae, Douglas)
February 19, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert James McDonald re County of Chelan and State of Washington. (CV, Case Administrator)
February 19, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Expedite Hearing on Writ of Habeas Corpus by Robert James McDonald. Motion Hearing set for 2/26/2020 Without Oral Argument before Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (CV, Case Administrator)
February 19, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Respondents (CV, Case Administrator)
February 19, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Filing fee $5 Receipt #YAK004262.) Filed by Robert James McDonald. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(CV, Case Administrator)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McDonald v. State of Washington et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: County of Chelan
Represented By: Douglas J Shae
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert James McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?