Reed v. Evenflo Company Inc
| Lindsay Reed |
| Evenflo Company Inc |
| 2:2020cv00081 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Salvador Mendoza |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Stay ALL PROCEEDINGS PENDING TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDATION BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION by Evenflo Company Inc. Motion Hearing set for 5/26/2020 Without Oral Argument before Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. (Scaramastra, Donald) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Stay All Proceedings Pending Transfer and Consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, ECF No. #5 , is GRANTED. The Court finds good cause exists to grant the motion. Accordingly, all pleading deadlines and all subsequent deadlines are hereby STAYED until April 27, 2020. No later than April 27, 2020, the parties shall file an appropriate motion or status report regarding the stay. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ENTRY. NO PDF TO ISSUE. THIS CONSTITUTES THE COURT'S RULING/NOTICE ON THE MATTER. (DB, Courtroom Deputy)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Stay all Proceedings Pending Transfer and Consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation by Evenflo Company Inc. Motion Hearing set for 4/24/2020 Without Oral Argument before Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. (Scaramastra, Donald) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Evenflo Company Inc. (Scaramastra, Donald) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald Byron Scaramastra on behalf of Evenflo Company Inc (Attorney Donald Byron Scaramastra added to party Evenflo Company Inc(pty:dft))(Scaramastra, Donald) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Evenflo Company Inc. (AY, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Class Action) against Evenflo Company Inc ( Filing fee $ 400; Receipt # 0980-3409726) Jury Demand. Filed by Lindsay Reed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Terrell, Beth) (Main Document 1 replaced on 2/27/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). Modified on 2/27/2020 to update Complaint to include pro hac vice pending attorneys' names in the signature block. (AY, Case Administrator). |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr assigned to case. (AY, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reed v. Evenflo Company Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Evenflo Company Inc | |
| Represented By: | Donald Byron Scaramastra |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lindsay Reed | |
| Represented By: | Beth E Terrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
