Edgmand v Coleman et al
| Brandon Jay Edgmand |
| Bill James Coleman, Patrica Zeisler and Scott Russell |
| 2:2020cv00165 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Salvador Mendoza |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH E-FILING PROGRAM. The Eastern District of Washington received documents from you for filing through the U.S. Postal Service. Pursuant to General Order 16-35-1, participation in the E-Filing Program is mandatory for all prisoner litigants incarcerated at facilities participating in the Prison E-Filing Program. Please comply by submitting all future documents to be filed with this Court to the law librarian/designee for electronic filing. (CLP, Case Administrator) **TEXT ONLY ENTRY, PRINT NEF ONLY** (Brandon Edgmand, Prisoner ID: 313561) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number and deficiency. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgment and Authorization) (CLP, Case Administrator) **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL** (Brandon Edgmand, Prisoner ID: 313561) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing Fee $400, Receipt # IFP Pending) Filed by Brandon Jay Edgmand. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CLP, Case Administrator) **4 PAGES, PRINT NEF ONLY**(Brandon Edgmand, Prisoner ID: 313561) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
