Mendez v. Pompeo et al
Plaintiff: Guadalupe Mendez
Defendant: George WP Atkins and Michael Richard Pompeo
Case Number: 2:2020cv00272
Filed: August 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Salvador Mendoza
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2020 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE as to #1 Complaint,,,,,, #2 Summons Issued and Exhibits to Complaint filed by Guadalupe Mendez. (Cook-Mowery, Clayton)
August 6, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (AY, Case Administrator)
August 6, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filed by Guadalupe Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit)(Cook-Mowery, Clayton) Pay.gov Tracking ID: 26PL0KTN. Modified on 8/6/2020 to add receipt number and replace documents with personal identifiers removed. (AY, Case Administrator). (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 3 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 4 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 5 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 6 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 7 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 8 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 9 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 9 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 10 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 11 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 12 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 13 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 14 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). (Attachment 15 replaced on 8/6/2020) (AY, Case Administrator). Modified on 8/6/2020 (AY, Case Administrator).
August 6, 2020 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr assigned to case. (AY, Case Administrator)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendez v. Pompeo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Guadalupe Mendez
Represented By: Clayton Cook-Mowery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George WP Atkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Richard Pompeo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?