Wright v. Airway Heights Corrections Center MSU et al
William J Wright |
Washington State Department of Corrections, James Key, Don McIntyre and Airway Heights Correction Center MSU |
2:2020cv00436 |
November 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Salvador Mendoza |
Rosanna Malouf Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand. by All Defendants.(Brooks, Jacob) |
Filing 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr for all further proceedings. Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. TEXT ORDER ONLY. NO PDF ATTACHED.(RG, Chief Deputy) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION of Jacob Brooks re #1 Notice of Removal, by All Defendants. (Brooks, Jacob) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Filing fee $400; Receipt #0980-3628902 Filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Superior Court Docket, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Notice of Assignment, #5 Exhibit E - Notice of Appearance, #6 Exhibit F - Affidavits of Service, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brooks, Jacob) |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson assigned to case. (AN, Courtroom Deputy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.