Roduner v. Does 1-10
| Jacqueline Roduner |
| Does 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv00007 |
| January 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Thomas O Rice |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Jacqueline Roduner re: Withdrawal of Subpoena to Marlette Funding LLC d/b/a Best Egg (Hammoud, Youssef) |
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING EARLY DISCOVERY #2 . Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
| Filing 6 Minute Entry for TELEPHONIC proceedings held before Judge Thomas O. Rice: Motion Hearing held on 1/26/2021. (Reported by: Allison Anderson) (LLH, Courtroom Deputy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Youssef H. Hammoud added for Plaintiff Jacqueline Roduner. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. TEXT ONLY ORDER; NO PDF WILL ISSUE. (BF, Paralegal)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Youssef H. Hammoud. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number 0980-3674058. by Jacqueline Roduner. Motion Hearing set for 2/19/2021 Without Oral Argument before Judge Thomas O. Rice. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(McCraw, Dawn) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Call-in Instructions re: Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Early Discovery scheduled for telephonic hearing on 1/26/2021 at 11:30 a.m. The parties are directed to call the Court's conference line at 888-273-3658 five (5) minutes prior to the designated hearing time. When prompted, enter Access Code 2982935 and Security Code 0007. The use of cellular phones is permitted, but not in speaker mode. The parties shall mute their phones unless addressing the Court. TEXT ONLY NOTICE; NO PDF WILL ISSUE. (BF, Paralegal) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Discovery by Jacqueline Roduner. Motion Hearing set for 1/26/2021 at 11:30 AM via Teleconference before Judge Thomas O. Rice. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed subpoena, #2 Exhibit B - Order denying motion to quash subpoena, #3 Exhibit C - Order granting motion plaintiff's motion for early discovery to identify doe defendants, #4 Exhibit D - Call records, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(McCraw, Dawn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1-10 ( Filing fee $ 402; Receipt # 0980-3660897) Jury Demand. Filed by Jacqueline Roduner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McCraw, Dawn) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Thomas O. Rice assigned to case. (LTR, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roduner v. Does 1-10 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does 1-10 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jacqueline Roduner | |
| Represented By: | Dawn McCraw |
| Represented By: | Youssef H Hammoud |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
