Markham v. Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center et al
Elena Markham |
Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center, Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center Security and Police, Sacred Heart Medical Center and Providence Psychiatry Sacred Heart Medical Center |
2:2021cv00105 |
March 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Salvador Mendoza |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel Charles Thilo on behalf of All Defendants (Attorney Samuel Charles Thilo added to party Providence Psychiatry Sacred Heart Medical Center(pty:dft), Attorney Samuel Charles Thilo added to party Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center(pty:dft), Attorney Samuel Charles Thilo added to party Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center Security and Police(pty:dft), Attorney Samuel Charles Thilo added to party Sacred Heart Medical Center(pty:dft))(Thilo, Samuel) |
Filing 14 ORDER TO AMEND OR VOLUNTARILY DISMISS COMPLAINT; Plaintiff may file within 60 days of the date of this order an amended complaint or attached motion to voluntarily dismiss complaint or risk dismissal and a 'strike' under 28 USC 1915(g). Amended Complaint/Voluntary Dismissal Deadline set for 6/28/2021. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (CLP, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
Filing 13 AMENDED ORDER REFUNDING FILING FEE re #12 Order (corrected caption). Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (CLP, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
Filing 12 ORDER REFUNDING FILING FEE. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (CLP, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE by Elena Markham re Defendant. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE by Elena Markham as to Defendants. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status. The District Court Executive shall set a case management review for 30 days, and immediately notify the assigned judicial officer, who will review the Complaint for legal sufficiency. IT IS SO ORDERED. - Text entry;no PDF document. Case Management Deadline set for 4/26/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (EW, Law Clerk) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff's Complaint seeks injunctive relief. If Plaintiff wishes to request a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order, she must file a motion for such relief and a motion to expedite if necessary. Such motion shall set forth the legal and factual grounds for relief and specifically detail what relief is requested. Plaintiff is directed to comply with all local and federal rules of civil procedure, including regarding notice to Defendants. In particular, the Court directs Plaintiff to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 and Local Civil Rule 7. THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY; NO PDF WILL ISSUE; THIS ENTRY CONSTITUTES THE COURTS RULING/NOTICE ON THE MATTER. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (CLP, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
Filing 5 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH LEAVE TO RENEW. Before the Court is Plaintiff's RENEWED request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals a lack of information regarding Plaintiffs income and expenses. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Case Management Deadline set for 4/19/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (CLP, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
Filing Fee Received. Receipt #26RJPUMK in the amount of $402.00 from Myriam Zayas. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Filing 3 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH LEAVE TO RENEW. Before the Court is Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals a lack of information regarding Plaintiffs income and expenses. Plaintiff failed to answer all the prompts set forth under question three. If Plaintiff receives any assistance from a public or private source, it must state so on the Application. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Case Management Deadline set for 4/5/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (CLP, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTION against All Defendants (Filing Fee $402, Receipt # IFP Pending) Jury Demand. Filed by Elena Markham. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LMR, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.