Baker v. United Parcel Service Inc
| Justin Baker |
| United Parcel Service Inc |
| 2:2021cv00162 |
| May 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Salvador Mendoza |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING PERMISSION TO PARTICIPATE PRO HAC VICE; granting #10 Defendant's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #11 Defendant's Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorneys Dominic E Draye and Naomi Beer added as pro hac vice counsel for United Parcel Service Inc. (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (AY, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Dominic E. Draye. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-3822489. by United Parcel Service Inc. Motion Hearing set for 8/2/2021 Without Oral Argument before Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dominic E. Draye, #2 Proposed Order)(Nelson, James)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Naomi G. Beer. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-3822461. by United Parcel Service Inc. Motion Hearing set for 8/2/2021 Without Oral Argument before Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Naomi G. Beer, #2 Proposed Order)(Nelson, James)
|
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. See ECF Nos. #3 , #5 & #6 . In response, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. ECF No. #7 . Accordingly, Defendant's motion to dismiss, ECF No. #3 , corrected at ECF Nos. #5 & #6 , is DENIED AS MOOT. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). TEXT-ONLY ENTRY; NO PDF DOCUMENT WILL ISSUE. THIS TEXT-ONLY ENTRY CONSTITUTES THE COURT'S ORDER OR NOTICE ON THE MATTER. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (AY, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss [Corrected]] at ECF No. 6 filed by Justin Baker. (Jarrard, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 7
First Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss [Corrected]] at ECF No. 6 filed by Justin Baker. (Jarrard, Thomas) Modified on 7/1/2021 to correct docket text (AY, Case Administrator).
|
|
Filing 6
CORRECTED DOCUMENT filed by All Defendants Re #3 MOTION to Dismiss , #5 MOTION to Dismiss [Corrected]]. Description: This filing to replace ECF 3 and 5 that had incorrect PDF attached.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Nelson, James)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Dismiss [Corrected]] by All Defendants. Motion Hearing set for 8/30/2021 Without Oral Argument before Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. (Nelson, James) Modified on 6/28/2021 to create docket entry relationship. See Corrected Document at ECF #6 (AY, Case Administrator).
|
|
Filing 4
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by All Defendants. (Nelson, James)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss by All Defendants. Motion Hearing set for 8/30/2021 Without Oral Argument before Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Nelson, James)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to United Parcel Service Inc. (SG, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against United Parcel Service Inc Fee Waived Jury Demand. Filed by Justin Baker. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Jarrard, Thomas)
|
|
Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr assigned to case. (SG, Case Administrator)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
