Burke v. State of Washington et al.,
| James Thomas Burke |
| State of Washington, Spokane County, Spokane Sheriffs Office, Dave Reagan, Eastern Washington Joint Fugitive Task Force and U.S. Marshal Service |
| 2:2022cv00004 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Mary K Dimke |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER TO COMPLY WITH FILING FEE/IN FORMA PAUPERIS REQUIREMENTS; Case Management Deadline set for 2/25/2022. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (MRJ, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number and deficiency. (MRJ, Case Administrator) Modified on 1/10/2022: Letter to include updated PLRA statement. (MRJ, Case Administrator). (Main Document 4 replaced on 1/10/2022) (MRJ, Case Administrator). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing Fee $402, Receipt # IFP Pending) Jury Demand. Filed by James Thomas Burke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits, #3 Transmittal Letter, #4 Transmittal Envelope)(MRJ, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
