Barr v. Standard Fire Insurance Company
| Heather Barr |
| Standard Fire Insurance Company |
| 2:2022cv00061 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Mary K Dimke |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STATUS REPORT filed Jointly by Standard Fire Insurance Company. (Lether, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE RESETTING HEARING BY COURT. *change in time only* The Scheduling Conference set on 6/7/2022 at 11:00 AM is RESET to 6/7/2022 at 3:45 PM via Video Conference before Judge Mary K. Dimke. Text entry; no PDF document.(LLH, Courtroom Deputy) |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE NOTICE: Scheduling Conference set for 6/7/2022 at 11:00 AM via Video Conference before Judge Mary K. Dimke. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(LLH, Courtroom Deputy) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Standard Fire Insurance Company.(Lether, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Filing fee $402; Receipt #AWAEDC-4008047 Filed by The Standard Fire Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Neal, Eric) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Mary K. Dimke assigned to case. (AY, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
