Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company SI v. Johnson et al
Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company SI |
Dennis S Johnson and Sharron J Johnson |
2:2022cv00114 |
May 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Salvador Mendoza |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kasey C Myhra on behalf of All Defendants (Attorney Kasey C Myhra added to party Dennis S Johnson(pty:dft), Attorney Kasey C Myhra added to party Sharron J Johnson(pty:dft))(Myhra, Kasey) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE by Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company SI re Sharron J Johnson. (Rosner, Paul) |
Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE by Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company SI re Dennis S Johnson. (Rosner, Paul) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company SI. (Rosner, Paul) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Dennis S Johnson, Sharron J Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Sharron J Johnson)(LAS, Case Administrator) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402; Receipt # AWAEDC-4034252) Filed by Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company, SI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Rosner, Paul) |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr assigned to case. (LAS, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.