Mathison v. United States of America
| France L. Mathison and France L Mathison |
| United States of America |
| 2:2022cv00194 |
| August 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Thomas O Rice |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting [ECF No. 3] Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. The United States shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before December 23, 2022. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. TEXT ORDER ONLY - NO PDF ATTACHED.
|
| Filing 3 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by United States of America. Motion Hearing set for 11/14/2022 Without Oral Argument before Judge Thomas O. Rice. (Bissell, Chelsea) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Summons U.S. Attorney, #2 Summons IRS)(LTR, Case Administrator) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Thomas O. Rice assigned to case. (LTR, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402; Receipt # AWAEDC-4105145) Jury Demand. Filed by France L. Mathison. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit1, #3 Summons AG, #4 Summons AUSA, #5 Summons IRS)(McCallum, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
