Olmstead v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
| Robert Zachariah Olmstead |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| 2:2022cv00198 |
| September 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Mary K Dimke |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Anthony S. Petru added for Plaintiff Robert Zachariah Olmstead. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (KMG)(9/28/22)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Anthony S. Petru. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-4127797. by Robert Zachariah Olmstead. Motion Hearing set for 10/28/2022 Without Oral Argument before Judge Mary K. Dimke. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE)(Levy, Scott) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #6 STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond by 11/14/2022. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (BM, Case Administrator)
|
| Filing 6 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Union Pacific Railroad Company. Motion Hearing set for 9/19/2022 Without Oral Argument before Judge Mary K. Dimke. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Coleman, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Coleman, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Association of Counsel by Timothy J Coleman on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Company (Attorney Timothy J Coleman added to party Union Pacific Railroad Company(pty:dft))(Coleman, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Zachariah Olmstead re Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Levy, Scott) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Union Pacific Railroad Company. (BM, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Union Pacific Railroad Company ( Filing fee $ 402; Receipt # AWAEDC-4114094) Jury Demand. Filed by Robert Zachariah Olmstead. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons)(Levy, Scott) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Mary K. Dimke assigned to case. (BM, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Olmstead v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Zachariah Olmstead | |
| Represented By: | Scott H Levy |
| Represented By: | Anthony S Petru |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | Timothy J Coleman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
