Guillen v. ICE Health Service Corps et al
| Noel Hernandez Guillen |
| ICE Health Service Corps, MD Mallya Ashok and RN Sofya Gancharova |
| 2:2022cv00222 |
| October 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Mary K Dimke |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case transferred to District of Western Washington. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (LTR, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
|
| Remark - Case transferred from Washington Eastern has been opened in United States District Court for the Western District of Washington as case 3:22-cv-05894, filed 11/18/2022. (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) (CLP, Case Administrator Team Lead) |
| Filing 2 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number and deficiency. (Attachments: #1 Declaration and Application to Proceed IFP) (LTR, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee not paid and no IFP submitted). Filed by Noel Hernandez Guillen. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Envelope)(LTR, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
