Industria de Diseno Textil, SA et al v. Zara Academy LLC et al
| Industria de Diseno Textil SA and Zara USA Inc |
| Zara Academy LLC and Gabriela Amante |
| 2:2023cv00046 |
| February 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Stanley A Bastian |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Report on the filing or determination of an action involving a trademark. Sent Copyright Report to the address on the "To" line of the form, along with a copy of the Complaint at ECF No. #1 . (REM, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons Gabriela Amante) (REM, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Industria de Diseo Textil, S.A., Zara USA, Inc.. (Black Horse, Bree) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gabriela Amante, Zara Academy, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402; Receipt # AWAEDC-4229893) Filed by Industria de Diseo Textil, S.A., Zara USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Summons, #9 Summons)(Black Horse, Bree) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian assigned to case. (REM, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
