Reevis v. Spokane County Superior Court et al
| Charles Joseph Reevis |
| Spokane County Detention Services Napacare, Eastern State Hospital, Spokane County Superior Court and Spokane County Police Department |
| 2:2024cv00033 |
| January 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Thomas O Rice |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter from Charles Joseph Reevis to U.S. District Court received on 3/21/2024. (REM, Case Administrator) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO COMPLY WITH FILING FEE/IN FORMA PAUPERIS REQUIREMENTS. Case Management Deadline set for 4/29/2024. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (REM, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number and deficiency. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (LTR, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
| Filing 1 (Construed) COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee not paid and no IFP submitted) Filed by Charles Joseph Reevis. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Transmittal Envelope)(LTR, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
