State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. United States Postal Service
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| United States Postal Service |
| 2:2025cv00513 |
| December 18, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Stanley A Bastian |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER DENYING #9 MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (CLP, Operations Supervisor)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Protective Order (See Parties' Stipulated Privacy Act Compliant / 26(c) Protective Order (attached)) by United States Postal Service. Motion Hearing set for 5/19/2026 Without Oral Argument before Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (Durkin, Timothy) |
|
Filing 8
BENCH TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: The Scheduling Conference set for April 9, 2026, is STRICKEN. A Pretrial Conference is set for 4/8/2027 at 10:00 AM in Spokane Courtroom 903. The Bench Trial is set for 5/3/2027 at 09:00 AM in Spokane Courtroom 903. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (WMK, Case Administrator)
|
| Filing 7 Joint Certificate Pursuant to Rule 26 / Rule 16 by the Parties, filed by United States Postal Service. (Durkin, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE NOTICE : Scheduling Conference set for 4/9/2026 at 10:30 AM by Video Conference before Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (REM, Courtroom Deputy) |
| Filing 5 Defendant U.S. Postal Service's ANSWER to Complaint by United States Postal Service.(Attorney Timothy Michael Durkin added to party United States Postal Service(pty:dft))(Durkin, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE re United States Postal Service. (SG, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Postal Service. (SG, Case Administrator) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian assigned to case. (SG, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Reinert, Christine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Postal Service ( Filing fee $ 405; Receipt # AWAEDC-4926322) Filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Reinert, Christine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. United States Postal Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Christine Lynn Reinert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Postal Service | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Michael Durkin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
