Chavez-DeRemer v. Toro Blanco, Inc. d/b/a Rancho Chico et al
| Lori Chavez-DeRemer |
| 7 Leguas Inc a corporation doing business as Rancho Chico (Spokane NW Blvd), Rodriguez-Anaya Inc doing business as Ranco Chico (Colville), Nolberto Rodriguez, Guillermina Rodriguez and Toro Blanco Inc a corporation doing business as Rancho Chico (Omak & Spokane Division) |
| 2:2026cv00140 |
| March 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Rebecca L Pennell |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 fl FLSA: Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Rebecca L. Pennell. (WMK, Case Administrator)
|
Filing 3
ORDER APPROVING CONSENT JUDGMENT; Granting #2 construed motion for approval of the Proposed Consent Judgment and Order. File is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Rebecca L. Pennell. (BM, Case Administrator)
|
| Filing 2 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Proposed Consent Judgment and Order by Lori Chavez-DeRemer. (Cameron, Katherine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Plaintiff Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Secretary of Labor against All Defendants Fee Waived Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cameron, Katherine) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Rebecca L. Pennell assigned to case. (BM, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.