Moore v. Arrindel et al
| Joe Moore |
| Travis Arrindel, Hannah Cohen, Kevin C McClanahan and Madalina Danescu |
| 2:2026cv00148 |
| March 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Stanley A Bastian |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL with prejudice. File is CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (BM, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
|
| Filing 4 Mail sent to Joe Moore, 40 Empire Pl, Sioux Falls, SD 57102 was returned as undeliverable re #3 Order to Show Cause. (DRB, Case Administrator) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OR AMEND COMPLAINT; Show Cause Response due by 5/1/2026. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (DRB, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
|
| Filing 2 EX PARTE Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by: Joe Moore. (DRB, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Travis Arrindel, Hannah Cohen, Madalina Danescu, Kevin C McClanahan (Filing Fee $405, Receipt # IFP Pending) Filed by Joe Moore. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DRB, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.