Tree Top Retirement Plan Committee v. Schoo et al
| Tree Top Retirement Plan Committee |
| Paulina Schoo, Juan Garcia and Abel Garcia |
| 2:2026cv00342 |
| August 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Alexander C Ekstrom |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 Interpleader Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent Form. Please Note: Declination of Consent Forms are not to be electronically filed with the Court. Parties wishing to decline consent of this assignment must complete and return the attached Declination of Consent Form to the Clerk of Court by the Case Management Deadline set for 8/24/2026. (SLS, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tree Top Retirement Plan Committee. (Goldberg, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Abel Garcia, Juan Garcia, Paulina Schoo ( Filing fee $ 405; Receipt # AWAEDC-5042436) Filed by Tree Top Retirement Plan Committee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Goldberg, Joshua) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge Alexander C Ekstrom assigned to case. (SLS, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
