Inman v. Covista Inc et al
| Emily Inman |
| Covista Inc, Adtalem Global Education Inc and Adtalem Global Health Inc doing business as American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine |
| 2:2026cv00389 |
| September 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Alexander C Ekstrom |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent Form. Please Note: Declination of Consent Forms are not to be electronically filed with the Court. Parties wishing to decline consent of this assignment must complete and return the attached Declination of Consent Form to the Clerk of Court by the Case Management Deadline set for 9/18/2026. (SLS, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SLS, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing Fee $405, Receipt # 285NNF89) Jury Demand. Filed by Emily Inman. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Envelope, #2 Civil Cover Sheer)(SLS, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
