Sutton v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
| Jason Lee Sutton |
| Washington State Department of Corrections, Bernard Warner, Robert Herzog, Roy Gonzalez, Donald Holbrook, Carla Schettler, Rob M Jackson, Gary Pierce, Steven Fleenor, Rachel Smith, Lee Young and John/Jane Doe 1-5 |
| 4:2015cv05123 |
| December 31, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Richland Office |
| Walla Walla |
| Mary K. Dimke |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
JUDGMENT in favor of Washington State Department of Corrections, Bernard Warner, Donald Holbrook, Rachel Smith, Steven Fleenor against Jason Lee Sutton. (TR, Case Administrator) **1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL** (Jason Sutton, Prisoner ID: 730954)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER Following Hearing on Defendants' Motion for Stay of Discovery 83 , Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Stay of Summary Judgment 96 , and Plaintiff's Oral Motion for an Extension of Time 103 **ACTION REQUIRED**. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke. (MO, Courtroom Deputy)**3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jason Sutton, Prisoner ID: 730954)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 54 Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Granting Defendants' 49 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke. (MO, Courtroom Deputy)**9 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jason Sutton, Prisoner ID: 730954)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
