Sather v. Nationwide Coin & Bullion Reserve Inc
Plaintiff: Mark Sather
Defendant: Nationwide Coin & Bullion Reserve Inc
Case Number: 4:2016cv05042
Filed: April 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Richland Office
County: Benton
Presiding Judge: Thomas O. Rice
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, all claims and causes of action in this matter are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to either party. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Paralegal)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sather v. Nationwide Coin & Bullion Reserve Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Sather
Represented By: Kevin Patrick Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nationwide Coin & Bullion Reserve Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?