Baugher v. Kadlec Health System
| Pamela A Baugher |
| Kadlec Health System |
| 4:2016cv05095 |
| July 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Richland Office |
| Benton |
| Thomas O. Rice |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. All claims and causes of action in this matter are DISMISSED without prejudice. Each party to bear its own costs and expenses. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Paralegal)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS. Defendants Motion for Expedited Hearing ECF No. 83 is GRANTED. Defendants Motion to Compel Independent Medical Examination ECF No. 84 is GRANTED; Plaintiff shall make herself available for examination at a reasonable ti me and place within 21 days of this Order. Defendants Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Production of Medical Records ECF No. 87 is GRANTED IN PART; within 21 days, Plaintiff shall provide her medical records (or sign a stipulation granting access to the same) for the two years immediately preceding this Order. Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration ECF No. 92 is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion to Withdraw ECF No. 94 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss ECF No. 93 is WITHDRAWN. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ENJOIN, ETC. Plaintiffs Motion to Enjoin ECF No. 64 is DENIED. Defendants Motion for Additional Time to Respond ECF No. 68 and Defendants Motion to Expedite the same ECF No. 67 are DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs Motion to Withdraw her Motion to Dismiss Complaint ECF No. 78 is GRANTED. Thus, Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Complaint ECF No. 74 is DENIED as withdrawn. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER DENYING CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO STRIKE. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment ECF Nos. 15 , 31 is DENIED. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 20 is DENIED. Defendants Motions to Strike ECF Nos. 35 , 36 are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court shall file a Scheduling Conference Notice. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs Voluntary Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice the Complaint ECF No. 4 is GRANTED. All claims and causes of action in this matter are DISMISSED without prejudice. The file is CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baugher v. Kadlec Health System | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pamela A Baugher | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kadlec Health System | |
| Represented By: | Jerome R Aiken |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
