R W v. Columbia Basin College et al
Plaintiff: R W
Defendant: Columbia Basin College, Lee Thornton and Ralph Reagan
Case Number: 4:2018cv05089
Filed: May 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Richland Office
County: Benton
Presiding Judge: Rosanna Malouf Peterson
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2617
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 266 ORDER DENYING 256 PLAINTIFF'S RULE 50(b) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OFLAW AND RULE 59 MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL AND GRANTING IN PART 257 PLAINTIFF'S RULE 59(e) MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT OR ALTERNATIVELY FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 60. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (SG, Case Administrator)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 255 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S RULE 50(a) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW; Denying 247 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (CLP, Case Administrator)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 254 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 242 DEFENDANTS' RULE 50(a) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (SG, Case Administrator)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 252 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION. Judgment entered in favor of Defendants Columbia Basin College, Lee Thornton and Ralph Reagan against Plaintiff RW. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 152 JUDGMENT in favor of Columbia Basin College against R W. (SG, Case Administrator)
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 84 JUDGMENT - Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 31 , is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 36 , is GRANTED IN PART with respect to liability on R.W.s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs motion is DENIED in part with respect to liability on his claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Washington Law Against Discrimination. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: R W v. Columbia Basin College et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R W
Represented By: Eric Bernard Eisinger
Represented By: Bret Uhrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Columbia Basin College
Represented By: Carl Perry Warring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lee Thornton
Represented By: Carl Perry Warring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ralph Reagan
Represented By: Carl Perry Warring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?