United States of America v. State of Washington, et al
| United States of America |
| Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, Joel Sacks, Jay Inslee and State of Washington |
| 4:2018cv05189 |
| December 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Stanley A Bastian |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Joint MOTION agreed briefing schedule, length of brief, stay of status report, continuance of scheduling conference re #15 Order on Motion to Stay, Order on Motion to Withdraw, #14 Scheduling Conference Notice, by All Defendants. Motion Hearing set for 2/14/2019 Without Oral Argument before Judge Stanley A Bastian. (Sandstrom, Anastasia) |
Filing 15
ORDER CONTINUING 26(F) CONFERENCE, withdrawing #9 Motion to Stay; and granting #12 Motion to Withdraw. Signed by Judge Stanley A Bastian. (LR, Case Administrator)
|
| Filing 14 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE NOTICE : A Telephonic Scheduling Conference has been set for 4/18/2019 at 11:00 AM in via Teleconference before Judge Stanley A Bastian. To participate, parties must call the Court Conference Line: 1-888-636-3807; Access: 8839796; No security code will be required. Please plan to call five minutes before the hearing. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate)(EC, Courtroom Deputy) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE on all Defendants, by U.S. Marshal filed by United States of America. (Healy, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Withdraw #9 MOTION to Stay in Light of Lapse of Appropriations , and Motion to Continue Deadline for Rule 26(f) Conference by United States of America. Motion Hearing set for 2/27/2019 Without Oral Argument before Judge Stanley A Bastian. (Healy, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT Regarding Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(f) Conference by All Defendants. (Sandstrom, Anastasia) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Stay in Light of Lapse of Appropriations filed by All Defendants. (Sandstrom, Anastasia) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Stay in Light of Lapse of Appropriations by United States of America. Motion Hearing set for 2/11/2019 Without Oral Argument before Judge Stanley A Bastian. (Healy, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by All Defendants.(Sandstrom, Anastasia) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Jay Inslee. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, #2 Summons Issued as to Joel Sacks, #3 Summons Issued as to State of Washington)(LR, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Anastasia Sandstrom on behalf of All Defendants (Attorney Anastasia Sandstrom added to party Jay Inslee(pty:dft), Attorney Anastasia Sandstrom added to party Joel Sacks(pty:dft), Attorney Anastasia Sandstrom added to party State of Washington(pty:dft), Attorney Anastasia Sandstrom added to party Washington State Department of Labor and Industries(pty:dft))(Sandstrom, Anastasia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jay Inslee, Joel Sacks, State of Washington, State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries Fee Waived Filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit HB 1723, #2 Exhibit Hanford Map, #3 Exhibit Map of HB 1723 Areas, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Healy, Christopher) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Stanley A Bastian assigned to case. (LR, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
