Ludlum v. C&I Engineering LLC
| Audrey Ludlum |
| C&I Engineering LLC |
| 4:2018cv05192 |
| December 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Thomas O Rice |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 First AMENDED COMPLAINT Class and Collective Action against C&I Engineering LLC. Jury Demand. Filed by Audrey Ludlum. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Kovarik, Nicholas) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Audrey Ludlum re C&I Engineering LLC. (Josephson, Michael) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Michael A Josephson added for Audrey Ludlum. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. TEXT ONLY ORDER; NO PDF WILL FOLLOW. (BF, Paralegal)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Andrew W Dunlap added for Audrey Ludlum. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. TEXT ONLY ORDER; NO PDF WILL FOLLOW. (BF, Paralegal)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Richard M Schreiber added for Audrey Ludlum. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. TEXT ONLY ORDER; NO PDF WILL FOLLOW. (BF, Paralegal)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Michael A. Josephson. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number 0980-3053494. by Audrey Ludlum. Motion Hearing set for 1/14/2019 Without Oral Argument before Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (Kovarik, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Andrew W. Dunlap. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number 0980-3053490. by Audrey Ludlum. Motion Hearing set for 1/14/2019 Without Oral Argument before Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (Kovarik, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Richard M. Schreiber. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number 0980-3053472. by Audrey Ludlum. Motion Hearing set for 1/14/2019 Without Oral Argument before Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (Kovarik, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to C&I Engineering LLC. (AY, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class and Collective Action against C&I Engineering, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400; Receipt # 0980-3053406) Jury Demand. Filed by Audrey Ludlum. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Kovarik, Nicholas) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice assigned to case. (AY, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ludlum v. C&I Engineering LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: C&I Engineering LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Audrey Ludlum | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas D Kovarik |
| Represented By: | Andrew W Dunlap |
| Represented By: | Michael A Josephson |
| Represented By: | Richard M Schreiber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
