Hart v. Department of Corrections et al
| Jason Mark Hart |
| Department of Corrections and Daniel Varnell |
| 4:2019cv05007 |
| January 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Salvador Mendoza |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number and deficiency. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application Form and Ack and Authization) (VR, Courtroom Deputy) **4 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL** (Jason Hart, Prisoner ID: 378403) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number and deficiency. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed IFP and Acknowledgment and Authorization) (VR, Courtroom Deputy) **4 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL** (Jason Hart, Prisoner ID: ) Modified on 1/16/2019 Entered in error - ECF No. #5 replaced with prisoner number. (VR, Courtroom Deputy). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Department of Corrections, Daniel Varnell. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL** (Jason Hart, Prisoner ID: ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Corrections, Daniel Varnell (Receipt # IFP PENDING) Jury Demand. Filed by Jason Mark Hart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(VR, Courtroom Deputy) **9 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Jason Hart, Prisoner ID: ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
