Phillips v. J.R. Simplot Company et al
| Michael Phillips |
| Does 1-10 and J R Simplot Company |
| 4:2019cv05234 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Thomas O Rice |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE NOTICE: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 12/18/2019 at 9:45 AM before Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by J R Simplot Company.(Maurer, Michael) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by J R Simplot Company. (Maurer, Michael) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED DOCUMENT by J R Simplot Company. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal, . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Franklin, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Filing Fee $400; Receipt #0980-3269299. Filed by J.R. Simplot Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C to Notice of Removal)(Franklin, Michael) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice assigned to case. (PL, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
