Young v. Desert Villa Partners LP et al
| Judith Lee Young |
| Desert Villa Partners LP, Desert Villa Apartments, Jan Angerman and Indgo LLT |
| 4:2020cv05005 |
| January 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Thomas O Rice |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH LEAVE TO RENEW. Before the Court is Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals a lack of information. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Case Management Deadline set for 2/13/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (CLP, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing Fee $400, Receipt # IFP Pending) Jury Demand. Filed by Judith Lee Young.(CLP, Case Administrator) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/14/2020: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CLP, Case Administrator). |
| Summons Issued as to Jan Angerman, Desert Villa Partners LP. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
