Williams v. ORRCO et al
| Shane Williams |
| ORRCO and Oil Re-Refining Company |
| 4:2020cv05039 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Salvador Mendoza |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: The parties' Stipulated Motion for Extension [of Time] to Respond to Complaint, ECF No. #3 , is GRANTED. Defendants shall file an Answer to the Complaint, ECF No. 1, by no later than May 3, 2020. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ENTRY. NO PDF TO ISSUE. THIS CONSTITUTES THE COURT'S RULING/NOTICE ON THE MATTER. (DB, Courtroom Deputy)
|
| Filing 3 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by All Defendants. Motion Hearing set for 5/8/2020 Without Oral Argument before Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order)(Krueger, Allyson) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SG, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400; Receipt # 0980-3409849) Jury Demand. Filed by Benjamin Riley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Riley, Benjamin) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr assigned to case. (SG, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
