Demos v. Holbrook et al
4:2020cv05062 |
April 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Richland Office |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy) **1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL** (John Demos, Prisoner ID: 287455) |
Filing 36 Order Denying Pending Motions, Terminating Certain Defendants, and Granting Second Opportunity to Amend or Voluntarily Dismiss. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Rights Complaint Form) (BF, Paralegal)**48 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(John Demos, Prisoner ID: 287455) |
Filing 2 ORDER OF TRANSFER by Magistrate Judge Theresa L Fricke re 1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, filed by John Robert Demos, Jr. The Court has reviewed plaintiff's proposed complaint and finds the proper venue for this case is the Eastern District of Washington. Therefore, the Court orders this case be transferred to the Eastern District of Washington. **4 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(John Demos, Prisoner ID: 287455)(SP) [Transferred from Washington Western on 4/9/2020.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Demos v. Holbrook et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.