Stanley v. Uttecht et al
| Sloan Patrick Stanley |
| J Uttecht and C Blount |
| 4:2020cv05152 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Salvador Mendoza |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Construed Motion to Disqualify Judge and Construed Motion for Reconsideration by Sloan Patrick Stanley. Motion Hearing set for 11/25/2020 Without Oral Argument before Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence addressed to Chief Judge, #2 Correspondence addressed to Clerk of the Court)(AY, Case Administrator) **44 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY** (Sloan Stanley, Prisoner ID: 386799) |
| Filing 11 Letter from United States District Court Clerk's Office, Eastern District of Washington to Sloan Patrick Stanley, #386799 dated 10/13/2020. (AY, Case Administrator) **1 PAGE, PRINT ALL** (Sloan Stanley, Prisoner ID: 386799) |
| Filing 10 Letter from Sloan Stanley, #386799 to Sean F McAvoy, Clerk of the Court received 10/13/2020 [last two pages of correspondence are not filed with the court]. (AY, Case Administrator) **4 PAGES, PRINT NEF ONLY** (Sloan Stanley, Prisoner ID: 386799) |
| Filing 9 Letter from Sloan Stanley, #386799 to Sean F McAvoy, Clerk of the Court received 10/08/2020 [last three pages of correspondence are not filed with the court]. (AY, Case Administrator) **5 PAGES, PRINT NEF ONLY** (Sloan Stanley, Prisoner ID: 386799) |
Filing 8
ORDER TO AMEND OR VOLUNTARILY DISMISS COMPLAINT AND DENYING #6 MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND RELATED MOTIONS. Plaintiff may file within 60 days of the date of this order an amended complaint or attached motion to voluntarily dismiss complaint or risk dismissal and a 'strike' under 28 USC 1915(g). Amended Complaint/Voluntary Dismissal Deadline set for 12/7/2020. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (Attachments: #1 First Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint FORM)(AY, Case Administrator) **28 PAGES, PRINT ALL** (Sloan Stanley, Prisoner ID: 386799)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting application to proceed In Forma Pauperis, Directing Institution to calculate, collect, and forward payment; application by plaintiff to proceed IFP is granted; an initial partial filing fee will be calculated and collected by Washington State Department of Corrections (agency having custody of plaintiff). cc of Order and Acknowledgment/Authorization sent to agency. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (CLP, Case Administrator) **3 PAGES, PRINT ALL** (Sloan Stanley, Prisoner ID: 386799)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Motion to Amend #1 Information [Construed Motion to Expedite, for Appointment of Counsel] by Sloan Patrick Stanley. Motion Hearing set for 11/4/2020 Without Oral Argument. (Attachments: #1 1, #2 Letter addressed to Clerk)(AY, Case Administrator) **12 PAGES, PRINT NEF ONLY** (Sloan Stanley, Prisoner ID: 386799) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number. (AY, Case Administrator) **PRINT ALL** (Sloan Stanley, Prisoner ID: 386799) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against C Blount, J Uttecht (Filing Fee $400, Receipt # IFP Pending) Jury Demand. Filed by Sloan Patrick Stanley. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Transmittal Letter)(AY, Case Administrator) **18 PAGES, PRINT NEF ONLY**(Sloan Stanley, Prisoner ID: 386799) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
