Kurszewski v. Saul
| Cheryl Kurszewski |
| Andrew M Saul |
| 4:2020cv05200 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Mary K Dimke |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status. IT IS SO ORDERED. TEXT ONLY entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order or notice on the matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (EW, Law Clerk)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cheryl Kurszewski re Andrew M Saul. (Hatfield, Chad)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Michael Durkin on behalf of Andrew M Saul (Attorney Timothy Michael Durkin added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(Durkin, Timothy)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT BY ALL PARTIES TO TRIAL AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH LEAVE TO RENEW. Before the Court is Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. A review of the affidavit of indigency, however, reveals that Plaintiff received a stimulus check and receives assistance with housing and transportation. Plaintiff failed to state the source or amount of the stimulus check, or the source and amount of the transportation or housing assistance. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall proffer the full filing fee, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Case Management Deadline set for 11/30/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (PH, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Andrew M Saul. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney, #2 Summons Issued as to Attorney General)(LMR, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Initial Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge and Consent or Non-Consent Form. Please Note: Consent Forms are not to be electronically filed with the Court. Return of Consent or Non-Consent is due by the Case Management Deadline set for 11/6/2020. (LMR, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew M Saul IFP Pending Filed by Cheryl Kurszewski. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Hatfield, Chad)
|
|
Notice of Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke assigned to case. (LMR, Case Administrator)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kurszewski v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cheryl Kurszewski | |
| Represented By: | Chad L Hatfield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Michael Durkin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
