Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Sarah Smith |
Providence Health and Services Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
4:2021cv05020 |
February 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Salvador Mendoza |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE on Secretaries of Labor and The Treasury filed by All Plaintiffs. (Edelblute, William) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs re Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Edelblute, William) |
Filing 4 Amended Summons Issued as to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (LMR, Case Administrator) |
Filing 3 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Summons Amended)(Edelblute, William) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Providence Health and Services Plan. (Attachments: #1 Providence Health & Services Plan) (SG, Case Administrator) |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr assigned to case. (SG, Case Administrator) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (ERISA) against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402; Receipt # AWAEDC-3710587) Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, #3 Summons Providence Health and Services Plan)(Edelblute, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.