Hudson v. The State of Washington et al
Michael Samuel Hudson, Jr |
CS3 SMS, State of Washington Department of Corrections, Robert Herzog, Jeffery Uttecht, Danielle Armbruster, Pat Barrera, The State of Washington, State of Washington Department of Enterprise Services, Kelly L Hodgson, Robert W Ferguson and J Roberts |
4:2021cv05039 |
March 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Thomas O Rice |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE RE: Unsigned Filing. Pursuant to Rule 11, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, you must sign each document you present to the Court. Please sign and return the signature page only of the Complaint. This is a text notice only. (SG, Case Administrator) **TEXT ONLY ENTRY, PRINT NEF ONLY** (Michael Hudson, Prisoner ID: 411651) |
Filing 2 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number and deficiency. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (SG, Case Administrator) **PRINT ALL** (Michael Hudson, Prisoner ID: 411651) |
Filing 1 Construed Complaint - Motion to Commence Civil Action; Request Certificate Order to Pursue Class Action against All Defendants (Filing fee not paid and no IFP submitted). Filed by Michael Samuel Hudson, Jr. (Complaint not signed) (SG, Case Administrator) **15 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Michael Hudson, Prisoner ID: 411651) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.