Harden v. BNSF Railway Company
Jerry L. Harden and Jerry L Harden |
BNSF Railway Company |
4:2021cv05136 |
October 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Salvador Mendoza |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Minute Entry for TELEPHONIC proceedings held before Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr: Scheduling Conference held on 12/9/2021. (Reported/Recorded by: Kimberly Allen) (TNC, Courtroom Deputy) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Compliance With Scheduling Order by Jerry L Harden (Cohen, C N) |
Filing 16 STATUS REPORT and Proposed Discovery Plan (Joint) by Jerry L Harden. (Cohen, C N) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Compliance With Scheduling Order by BNSF Railway Company (Chait, Michael) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Change of Address by C N Coby Cohen (Cohen, C N) |
Filing 13 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE NOTICE : Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 12/9/2021 at 08:40 AM via Teleconference before Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. (Attachments: #1 Consent to MJ Form)(TNC, Courtroom Deputy) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand. by BNSF Railway Company.(Chait, Michael) |
Filing 11 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by BNSF Railway Company. (Chait, Michael) |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING #7 DEFENDANT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION FOR ADMISSION OF MATTHEW C. JARDINE PRO HAC VICE. Added Attorney Matthew C Jardine for BNSF Railway Company. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #5 DEFENDANT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION FOR ADMISSION OF CHAD M. KNIGHT PRO HAC VICE. Added Attorney Chad M Knight for BNSF Railway Company. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Filing 8 DECLARATION by Matthew C. Jardine in Support re #7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Matthew C. Jardine. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-3901343. filed by BNSF Railway Company. (Chait, Michael) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Matthew C. Jardine. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-3901343. by BNSF Railway Company. Motion Hearing set for 10/22/2021 Without Oral Argument before Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Chait, Michael) |
Filing 6 DECLARATION by Chad M. Knight in Support re #5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Chad M. Knight. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-3901340. filed by BNSF Railway Company. (Chait, Michael) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Chad M. Knight. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-3901340. by BNSF Railway Company. Motion Hearing set for 10/22/2021 Without Oral Argument before Judge Salvador Mendoza Jr. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Chait, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E Chait on behalf of BNSF Railway Company (Attorney Michael E Chait added to party BNSF Railway Company(pty:dft))(Chait, Michael) |
Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE by Jerry L Harden re BNSF Railway Company. (Cohen, C N) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to BNSF Railway Company. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr assigned to case. (CLP, Case Administrator) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BNSF Railway Company ( Filing fee $ 402; Receipt # AWAEDC-3890962) Jury Demand. Filed by Jerry L. Harden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Cohen, C N) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.