Huber v. Washington State Dept of Corrections et al
| Bryce N Huber |
| Robert Jackson, Melissa Andrewjeski, Maryann Curl, Jake Jennings, James Duncan, Jonathan Neau and Washington State Dept of Corrections |
| 4:2023cv05013 |
| January 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Mary K Dimke |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing Fee Received. Receipt #41286 in the amount of $402.00 from Nickie Ortiz o/b/o Bryce Huber. (AY, Case Administrator) **PRINT NEF ONLY** (Bryce Huber, Prisoner ID: 352455) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO COMPLY WITH FILING FEE REQUIREMENTS ( Plaintiff must either pay the full filing fee or comply with the in forma pauperis statute. ) Filing Fee due by 4/3/2023. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (TR, Case Administrator) **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL** (Bryce Huber, Prisoner ID: 352455)
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number. (SG, Case Administrator) **PRINT ALL** (Bryce Huber, Prisoner ID: 352455) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing Fee $402, Receipt # IFP Pending) Jury Demand. Filed by Bryce N Huber. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(SG, Case Administrator) **27 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Bryce Huber, Prisoner ID: 352455) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
