Romero Meraz v. Miller et al
| Diego Romero Meraz |
| Loren K Miller, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 4:2024cv05018 |
| February 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Mary K Dimke |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Dismissed without prejudice. This file is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (TNC, Case Administrator)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by Diego Romero Meraz (Soto, Destiny) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diego Romero Meraz re Loren K Miller. (Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diego Romero Meraz re Alejandro Mayorkas. (Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diego Romero Meraz re Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (BM, Case Administrator) |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Mary K. Dimke assigned to case. (BM, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren K Miller ( Filing fee $ 405; Receipt # AWAEDC-4478952) Filed by Diego Romero Meraz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons All Defendants, #3 Exhibit A-C)(Quiroga, Hector) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
