Gentry v. Lambert
Jonathan Lee Gentry |
John Lambert and Steven Sinclair |
2:1999cv00289 |
April 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 373 ORDER granting respondent's 359 Motion to Vacate stay of execution by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) Modified on 2/5/2014/cc Sutton (RS). |
Filing 320 ORDER denying petitioner's 316 Motion for New Trial or to Amend Judgment by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) |
Filing 315 ORDER REGARDING WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; granting 313 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Added attorney Rita J Griffith for Jonathan Lee Gentry, Timothy K. Ford for Jonathan Lee Gentry. Attorney Scott J Engelhard and Meredith Martin Rountree terminated, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(VP) |
Filing 311 ORDER REQUIRING ENTRY OF SEPARATE JUDGMENT re 308 MOTION for Judgment to be Filed as Separate Document filed by Jonathan Lee Gentry by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. cc Sutton (RS) |
Filing 310 ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. The Court DENIES Pltf's motion to supplement his previous motions for reconsideration, docket no. 303 .(CL) . (cc: atty R. Sutton, ecf atty application also mailed). |
Filing 306 ORDER denying petitioner's 293 Motion for Reconsideration by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) Modified on 3/23/2009/cc R Sutton (RS). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.