Chen et al v. Dougherty et al
Case Number: 2:2004cv00987
Filed: April 30, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
Presiding Judge: Marsha J. Pechman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 561 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 531 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting in part and denying in part 537 Motion for Attorney Fees, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (LG)
May 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 529 ORDER ON POST TRIAL MOTIONS granting plaintiff's 502 Motion for Judgment; granting plaintiffs' 503 Motion for Judgment; denying dfts' 504 Motion for judgment as matter of law ; denying dfts' 507 Motion for entry of findings of facts by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RS)
February 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 425 ORDER on remaining issues of protected speech: the Court finds that Mr. Chen and Mr. Barahimi's union grievance constitutes protected speech, as does Mr. Barahimi's 2004 lawsuit. However, the Court refrains from ruling on whether Mr. Barah imi may pursue his claim of retaliation for bringing the 2004 lawsuit until additional briefing is submitted by the parties. Plaintiff's response on this issue is due 3/4/09 and Defendants' reply is due 3/6/09. by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (LG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chen et al v. Dougherty et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?