Fernandes v. Link et al
| Terence Fernandes |
| Max E Link, James A Bianco, John M Fluke, Jr, Vartan Gregorian, Philip M Nudelman, Mary O'Neil Mundinger, Erich Platzer, Jack W Singer, Silvano Spinelli, 1-25 Does and Cell Therapeutics Inc |
| 2:2005cv00964 |
| May 26, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2006. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by parties. (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 24 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); and for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 by Defendant Cell Therapeutics Inc. Noting Date 8/25/2006. (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 23 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 06/20/06-Motion Hearing before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Court Reporter: Joseph Roth. (LMK) |
Filing 22
ORDER granting #14 Motion to Dismiss; plaintiff's request for leave to amend is granted, plaintiff shall file a second amended derivative complaint within 30 days. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(SES)
|
| Filing 21 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Ricardo S Martinez - Dep Clerk: Laurie Cuaresma; Pla Counsel: Jeffrey Fink, Kirk Mulfinger; Def Counsel: Barry Kaplan; CR: Joe Roth; Time of Hearing: 1:30 PM; Motion Hearing held on 6/20/2006 re #14 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Derivative Complaint filed by Cell Therapeutics Inc. Court hears argument of counsel. The Court takes the matter under advisement and will rule as soon as possible. (LC, ) |
| Filing 20 SUPPLEMENT re #14 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Derivative Complaint, #18 Reply to Response to Motion Statement of Supplemental Authority in Support of Motion to Dismiss Derivative Complaint by Defendant Cell Therapeutics Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A#2 Exhibit B#3 Exhibit C)(Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Terence Fernandes, to #14 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Derivative Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Supplemental Authority)(Mulfinger, Kirk) |
| Set Oral Argument on #14 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Derivative Complaint: Motion Hearing set for 6/20/2006 at 1:30 PM before Hon. Ricardo S. Martinez. (LW) |
| Filing 18 REPLY, filed by Defendant Cell Therapeutics Inc, TO RESPONSE to #14 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Derivative Complaint (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Terence Fernandes, to #14 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Derivative Complaint. (Mulfinger, Kirk) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Stipulated Motion setting schedule for filing opposition and reply briefs re: Cell Therapeutics, Inc.'s motion to dismiss for failure to make demand. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(CM )
|
| Filing 15 Stipulated MOTION and Proposed Order Setting Schedule for Filing Opposition and Reply Briefs by Defendant Cell Therapeutics Inc. Noting Date 2/24/2006. (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Derivative Complaint by Defendant Cell Therapeutics Inc. Noting Date 3/3/2006.Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Declaration#2 Exhibit A to Declaration#3 Exhibit B to Declaration#4 Proposed Order #5 Certificate of Service)(Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Barry M Kaplan on behalf of Defendant Cell Therapeutics Inc (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION by Defendant James A Bianco AND ORDER admitting Norman J Blears pro hac vice. Receipt # 320750. (RS, ) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE by Plaintiff Terence Fernandes. (Mulfinger, Kirk) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) all defendants with JURY DEMAND, filed by Terence Fernandes. (Attachments: #1)(Mulfinger, Kirk) |
| Filing 9 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of summons and complaint by counsel Daniel J. Dunne, Jr. on behalf of Defendants Mary O'Neil Mundinger, Jack W Singer, Cell Therapeutics Inc, James A Bianco, John M Fluke, Jr, Vartan Gregorian on 10/21/2005. (Dunne, Daniel) |
|
Filing 8
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER setting schedule for filing amended complaint and response by Judge James L. Robart for Judge Martinez. (RS, )
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER AMENDED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR FILING AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE by parties. (Dunne, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR FILING AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE by parties. (Dunne, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Service Verification by Plaintiff Terence Fernandes. (Attachments: #1 Verification of Service)(Mulfinger, Kirk) Text Modified on 8/25/2005 (LMS, ). |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE of summons and complaint by Plaintiff Terence Fernandes on 08/03/2005 (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service #2 Certificate of Service)(Mulfinger, Kirk) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address by Kirk Robert Mulfinger (Mulfinger, Kirk) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Judge James L. Robart. Case reassigned to Judge Ricardo Martinez for all further proceedings. Judge James L. Robart no longer assigned to case. All future pleadings shall bear the cause number C05-964RSM.(CL, )
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 05-2-15473-0 SEA; (Receipt # 852402), filed by Mary O'Neil Mundinger, and Vartan Gregorian. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DJ) Modified on 6/1/2005: edited names of removing defendants. (PM, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
