Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Williamsburg Condominium Association et al
Case Number: 2:2005cv01240
Filed: July 13, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Insurance Office
Presiding Judge: Marsha J. Pechman
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER granting 169 Motion for Attorney Fees. Defendant must file a proposed final order supported by affidavits and billing records by 8/17/2009, any objections to that filing are due by 8/31/2009, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (LG)
July 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 184 ORDER granting 174 Motion for Bill of Costs in the amount of $ 865.85 against Plaintiff Mid-Continent Casualty Co. by Clerk Bruce Rifkin.(BR)
June 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 166 ORDER granting 140 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 157 Motion for Summary Judgment, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (LG)
February 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 154 ORDER denying 149 Motion for to dismiss for lack of standing. Titan's motion for summary judgment 140 is re-noted for 3/13/2009. by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(LG, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Williamsburg Condominium Association et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?