Van Buskirk et al v. Conocophillips Inc et al
2:2006cv01220 |
August 23, 2006 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
John C Coughenour |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 ORDER by Judge John C Coughenour. The Court DENIES 92 Defendants' Motion for Bill of Costs. (CL) |
Filing 90 ORDER by Judge John C Coughenour. The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Dkt. Nos. 64 & 65 ). Plaintiffs' Motion to Substitute One Expert Witness (Dkt. No. 68 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. (CL) |
Filing 63 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE; 39.1 mediation to be completed by 11/17/2009, Dispositive motions due by 10/1/2009, Motions in Limine due by 12/31/2009, by Judge John C Coughenour. (VP) |
Filing 61 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion to Consolidate Cases; Pltf's request for consolidation of the three actions is denied. Pltf's request for bifurcation is denied as moot. The Court sets a new trial date of 1/11/2010 at 9:30 AM before Judge John C Coughenour. Voir dire/jury instructions/trial briefs due by 1/7/2010, Pretrial Order due by 12/31/2009, by Judge John C Coughenour.(VP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Van Buskirk et al v. Conocophillips Inc et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.