Crystal Conservation Coalition v. Crystal Mountain Inc
| 2:2006cv01770 |
| December 12, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 Clean Water Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
AGREED ORDER Approving Alterations to Modified Consent Decree re parties' 56 Stipulation, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER denying defendant's 46 Motion for Declaration of Substantial Compliance, Clarification or Modification, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER vacating Court's Minute Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates (dkt. 28 ); re parties' 42 Joint Motion for Relief from Deadline, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
24
AMENDED ORDER REOPENING CASE and Setting Deadline for Joint Status Report, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER REOPENING CASE and Setting Deadline for Joint Status Report by Judge Robert S. Lasnik: FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 6/5/2017, Disclosure Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1) is due 6/23/2017, Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan due by 6/30/2017. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crystal Conservation Coalition v. Crystal Mountain Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
