High Maintenance Bitch LLC v. Uptown Dog Club Inc
Plaintiff High Maintenance Bitch, LLC alleged that defendant Uptown Dog Club, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. D475,163 and D468,491 and D475,162.
| High Maintenance Bitch LLC |
| Uptown Dog Club Inc |
| 2:2007cv00888 |
| June 8, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| John C Coughenour |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 183 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENTJoint Status Report due by 10/22/2007,FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 10/9/2007.,Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/22/2007. by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (CH)
|
|
Filing
16
DECLARATION of Lisa Woody in Support of Uptown Dog's Reply to 6 MOTION to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Civil Rule 12(B)(2) and improper venue, or alternatively, to transfer and for Plaintiff to provide a more definite statement (Fricke, Steven) Modified on 8/20/2007 (ECS, ).
|
|
Filing
14
Proposed MOTION for Order by Plaintiff High Maintenance Bitch LLC. Noting Date 8/17/2007.(Bronski, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
10
MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE is made at the direction of the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge. This action is transferred to the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly as related to case number 07-886TSZ. All pleadings in the future shall bear case number C07-888TSZ. Case reassigned to Judge Thomas S. Zilly for all further proceedings. Judge Robert S. Lasnik no longer assigned to case.(TS, )
|
|
Filing
9
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRCP 7.1. (Fricke, Steven)
|
|
Filing
8
DECLARATION of Steven P. Fricke filed by Defendant Uptown Dog Club Inc re 6 MOTION to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Civil Rule 12(B)(2) and improper venue, or alternatively, to transfer and for Plaintiff to provide a more definite statement (Fricke, Steven) Modified on 7/25/2007 (ECS, ).
|
|
Filing
5
This Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge. This matter is hereby REASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge. All future filings shall bear the cause number C07-0888-RSL. (CL, )
|
|
Filing
4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE of summons and complaint by Defendant Uptown Dog Club Inc on 06/08/ (Bronski, Daniel)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: High Maintenance Bitch LLC v. Uptown Dog Club Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: High Maintenance Bitch LLC | |
| Represented By: | Daniel M Bronski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Uptown Dog Club Inc | |
| Represented By: | Steven P Fricke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
